the obelisk in keep defence.
i think most people are more or less ok with the damage reduction part but i really wonder if the perma moc isn't OP, especially for optimized caster groups that have excellent communications. the perma moc might need tweaking, changing or may need to go.
discuss.
discuss.
Stor Hurfru Muylasav, wildly swinging arms around. Vicomte Muylock, calling curses on enemies. Baron Muylaetrex, Undead guy. Baronet Muylaetrix, calling upon winter storms. Baronet Facetothewallmuppet, support type standing with his face to the wall most of the time. Baronetess Yovonne, taxi. some other chars with names starting with Muyl.
Comments
-Antiimony
Tullechamp/Tullehrs Hib
Tullescout/Tullemc Alb
/Tullechamp/Tullehrs GirlPower Hib
/Tullescout GirlPower albion
/Tullebone GirlPower midgaard
/Tullesometing on all 3 realms
Tie the damage reduction component to keep ownership. Retain MoC functionality as is (%effectiveness determined by your spec in MoC).
- 7 or more keeps owned = 0% damage reduction
- 5 to 6 keeps owned = 25% damage reduction
- 3 to 4 keeps owned = 50% damage reduction
- 0 to 2 keeps owned = 75% damage reduction
One additional modification that I would like to see is to remove the Protection Obelisk from keeps that hold an enemy relic.
The goal behind this approach is to increase the difficulty of capturing enemy realm keeps and relics while decreasing the difficulty in recapturing home realm keeps and relics. This does nothing to incentivize relic capturing which is a separate issue. However, it does address the problem of "allowing" an enemy realm to capture your home relic to increase the effectiveness of the Protection Obelisk. One possible pitfall is that players refuse to recapture home realm keeps in order to retain the high damage reduction. Although, that comes at a cost of not having teleports which may be a sufficient incentive. Teleport and relic gate supply lines may need to be re-evaluated with this modified functionality in mind.